Iran threatens to sue BP for oil pollution

Minister claims oil dumped in Caspian Sea

Iran has threatened to sue oil company BP after claims that their Azeri oil platforms are polluting the Caspian Sea.

Iranian media reports that the country’s deputy environment minister, Abdolreza Karbasi, is considering taking BP to court because of oil that has been washed up on Iranian beaches over the past year. ‘Last year, southern coasts of the Caspian Sea were covered with oily patches, and in the last such case, four months ago, 25 tonnes were cleared from Iranian coasts’ said Karbasi, according to Mehr News. It has yet to be revealed what court Iran would attempt to sue BP in. In an email statement, BP claimed they are committed to reporting any oil leaks in Caspian Sea but haven't had to report anything for several years.

BP claims there have been no oil leaks, but Iranian officials say otherwise

(Image source - The Guardian)

This news follows reports on Iran’s Press TV that neighbouring Tehran may sue Azerbaijan, where most of the oil platforms are based. Recently, it has also been announced that Shell Nigeria has been ordered by a Dutch court to pay compensation to a farmer who complained about pollution in the country. The company did however manage to avoid similar charges over complaints made by four other farmers.

'Green Deal' won't work, experts warn

Flagship scheme ‘not guaranteed’ to save consumers money

The government’s ‘Green Deal’ home insulation project that launched today has faced criticism from experts who believe the scheme won’t achieve its goal of getting people out of fuel poverty.

Despite reassurance from government officials that the savings that will come with lower energy usage will outweigh the cost of the ‘green’ loans needed to install the energy-saving features, many experts believe that factors such as the interest rate of the loans (set at just under 7%), along with the cost of initial assessments of the property, set-up fees and operating charges, will put people off investing in the scheme. There are also worries that potential clients will be put off by the fact that the loan repayments are left with the house, meaning that someone moving into a property that has had energy-saving work done to it will have to take over the loan repayments.

The government's energy-saving scheme has been heavily criticised by experts

(Image source - www.bbacerts.co.uk)

Alan Milstein, chairman of the Residential Property Surveyors Association, said ‘For many consumers, taking on a green deal loan may not be the most cost-effective mechanism to fund any green improvements to their property. With early repayment penalties and the uncertainty surrounding how having a green deal loan attached to your property will impact on its future saleability, for many homeowners it may be advisable to look at alternative ways to fund energy efficiency measures’.

This news has put a dampener on the launch of the ‘Green Deal’, although according to a poll published last week, over 80% of people had never heard of the scheme.

What will Obama do about Keystone?

With majority of Senate backing pipeline plans, President faces tough decision

President Barack Obama is facing pressure to go back on his climate change promise as a bipartisan majority in the Senate has called for the controversial Keystone XL pipeline to go ahead.

A letter from 53 senators, a group made up of both Democrats and Republicans, claimed there was no reason to deny approval of the project as it has undergone in-depth environmental review despite protests from campaigners who believe the pipeline, which will pump crude oil from Alberta Tar Sands in Canada to oil refineries in Texas, will lead to higher carbon emissions. 

Whatever Obama decides on the project, the decision will upset a lot of people

(Image source - ABC News)

Keystone leaves Obama in a very difficult position, having pledged to tackle climate change during his second term as President. Denying the project will anger many politicians, who see Keystone as way of providing more energy and creating jobs, but approving it will be seen by environmental campaigners as going back on his word. However, Henry Waxman, a congressman who has set up a taskforce on climate change with senator Sheldon Whitehouse and is against the pipeline, denies that the issue will be ‘make-or-break’ for Obama, saying ‘This is only a small issue compared to the overall objective that the president and we want to achieve," Waxman said. "What would you like me to do? Should I say to the president, 'If you don't agree with me on Keystone, I'm not going to work with you on solving the climate change issue'? That would be a little bit childish and counterproductive’.

Waxman’s views that Keystone is a small issue are held by many others, including the Washington Post, who in an editorial called on the President to ‘ignore the activists who have bizarrely made Keystone XL a line-in-the-sand issue, when there are dozens more of far greater environmental impact’.

'Green Deal? What's that then?'

Over 80% of people haven't heard of new government energy-saving scheme

Just days before a new scheme designed to help people deal with energy costs launches, a poll has discovered that 4 out of 5 people have never heard of it.

The ‘green deal’ works by offering loans to pay for home improvements such as roof insulation, new boilers and draught-proofing, which will help lower the overall cost of energy bills. However, a YouGov poll of 5,071 UK energy customers found that 81% hadn’t heard of the new scheme, with 51% citing that the initial cost of upfront ‘assessment fees’ of between £85 to £150 was a major obstacle for them.

The cost of things like roof insulation is putting people off making their homes energy-efficient

(Image source - solar-renewable-energy.co.uk)

The climate minister, Greg Barker, isn’t worried about the findings, as the scheme is still in its infancy, so people shouldn’t expect a ‘big bang’. He said, ‘We're right at the beginning of the green deal journey, and the report is right to identify there is relatively low consumer understanding around the green deal. It's as you'd expect, as it's yet to be rolled out. I expect that to change over the coming year’.

However, the shadow climate minister, Luciana Berger, has slammed the Coalition’s handling of the scheme, saying ‘It's very worrying that so few people have heard of the green deal just days before it finally goes live’. She added that the interest rates on the loans will leave people paying back more than twice the upfront cost of the measures they have installed, which she thinks will leave many people saying ‘no deal’ to the ‘green deal’.

Why can't Britain deal with snow?

We all knew it was coming, so why couldn't we handle it?

If you live in the UK, you would have experienced (or at least heard about) the recent snowfall that has left many areas with up to 8 inches of snow. Warnings were issued, roads were gritted and shoppers panic-bought, with a Tesco store in Aberdare, South Wales selling out of bread and milk the night before. But despite all of the preparations and heads-up that the snow was coming, when it actually came the country came to a virtual stand-still. But why? Why after all these years of getting snow during the winter can Britain not seem to cope with it?

Bread, milk, fruit and fresh meat all sold out in stores across South Wales

(Image source - ITV)

Services

In the days before the snowfall gritters across the country were out in force, making sure all of the main roads were clear. But it seems that’s where they stopped; the main roads. It’s understandable that main roads are made a priority and that budgets mean smaller roads can’t be gritted as much, but in many cases there is no attempt to do anything about these smaller roads and the side-streets. It’s all well and good to make sure the major roads are cleared for traffic, but if the traffic can’t get from the smaller roads to the main ones then what’s the point?

Instead of cancelling trains in advance, why can't providers do something about snow-covered tracks?

(Image source - Metro)

Another service that is also often affected by the snow is transport. As with cars, if roads aren’t safe for buses to drive along then they can’t run. But trains run on tracks, which are never as badly affected by snow as roads. Yet last week, as the snow hit, many services were either delayed severely or cancelled completely. In some cases, trains were cancelled before the snow had actually hit. Rather than preparing for the snow by cancelling trains, why couldn’t providers actually do something to allow their trains to run in the snow?  


Attitude

Whilst a lot of people hate the way snow disrupts normal-day life, many others embrace it, as it gives them the ‘snow day’. The day where it is ‘impossible’ to get to work so you’ll just have to stay at home. For many people that is true because, as mentioned earlier, a lack of gritting on side-streets means many people can’t safely get to work. And with retail workers, if people can’t get to the store to shop then there’s no reason for the store to open. But in many cases, people can get to work. People with access to main roads can easily drive to their offices and places of work. Those who use public transport can get a train and get to work. And those who walk can, well, walk.

Snow doesn't stop everyone from getting to work, so why do so many take the day off?

(Image source - BBC News)

There is a general feeling across the country that when it snows we can’t do anything. But we can, if we just made the effort, and if transport providers made the effort too.


Media

As has already been said, the newspapers have been talking about the incoming snow for weeks. During the past few days, the reports on the weather during news programmes have featured several stories about the snow and residents trying to deal with it, all of which can be simplified to ‘There’s snow’. There seems to be a media frenzy when it comes to the snow. News outlets all seem to be telling us how bad the snow is and how devastating it has been, leading to public panic and the view that they can’t do anything because of the snow.

Should a bit of snow really be making the front pages?

(Image source - Daily Express)

There are many developed countries across the world who are capable of functioning despite heavy snowfall on a regular basis. Surely Britain can find a way to cope for the handful of days every year it snows, especially when everyone knows about it weeks in advance.

White House inaction on climate change is not Obama's fault

Report says environmental groups are to blame

A research paper written by a Harvard academic has suggested that President Barack Obama is not to blame for America’s apparent inaction on tackling the threat of climate change.

Scholar Theda Skocpol, who is due to present her findings at a Harvard forum next month, has instead put the blame for these failings on environmental groups, who she says were blind to extreme Republican opposition to their efforts. These groups failed to consider just how opposed certain groups would be to environmental reform and naively though they could still win them over with ‘insider grand bargaining’.

Obama is unlikely to make climate change an major issue, despite campaigners calling for him to do so

(Image source - CBS)

Skocpol also states that climate change will not be a major issue for Obama in his second term as President, which will come as a blow to campaigners who have appealed for Obama to take action following several high profile events such as Superstorm Sandy that they believe were results of global warming. "Whatever environmentalists may hope, the Obama White House and congressional Democrats are unlikely to make global warming a top issue in 2013 or 2014," she writes.

Skocpol writes that these high profile events are not enough in themselves to get the issue of climate change on the national agenda, and believes that 'fresh strategies will be needed, based on new understandings of political obstacles and opportunities'.

Linking offshore wind farms to grid will cost £17bn

Fears that development costs could lead to higher prices for consumers

Plans to link offshore wind farms to the grid may result in higher electricity prices for consumers, it has been warned by a committee of MPs.

The method of bringing power from offshore wind farms, and onshore ones, to land is very complex and has been a major obstacle in the development and expansion of the wind energy industry, as a heavy-duty transmission infrastructure has to be developed, which has left many wind farms waiting for long periods to be connected to the grid.

Currently, a licensing system is in place which allows transmission lines to be constructed by the National Grid and other developers, who are then given a guaranteed income for 20 years; a total cost of £17bn. However, companies can only be fined 10% of their income if they fail to meet obligations, which Margaret Hodge, the chair of the public accounts committee, fears will lead to higher prices for consumers. She said, ‘Not only is it unlikely that this licensing system for bringing electricity from offshore wind farms on to the national grid will deliver any savings for consumers, it could well lead to higher prices. Indeed the terms of the licences appear to have been designed almost entirely to attract investors at the expense of securing a good deal for consumers’.

Offshore wind farms seem to be a good source of energy, but getting to use this energy is costly

(Image source - The Guardian)

Ofgem, the energy regulator, responded to the MPs report by highlighting the fact that it was only able to cover the first four tenders for licences, and added that the competition for these licences had saved customers about £290m. They said: ‘Our objective is to ensure this necessary investment is delivered at a fair price. As with any new market, there are lessons from early transactions. The initial tenders were conducted under interim arrangements. "It has always been Ofgem's intent to refine the tender process to deliver greater efficiencies and further benefits to consumers’.

As has been said before, new forms of energy production will, in the short term, lead to higher bills to cover the costs of implementing these new initiatives, though it is expected that these renewable forms of energy production will lead to cheaper bills in the future. But what do you think? Are you willing to pay more now for cheaper bills later? Let us know your views in the comments below.

Are politicians really that out of touch with the public?

MPs calling for higher wages despite millions struggling with low pay and rising energy bills

Earlier this week, the results of a survey of 100 MPs were released, showing that 69% thought that their annual wage of £65,738 made them ‘under-paid’, with the majority of them suggesting that their wage should be at least £96,740.

Considering the expenses scandals of recent years, and the fact that millions of people are struggling to afford things like food, housing, energy bills and general living costs, the news that MPs think they are hard done by is just astonishing. It’s not just because of things like their second homes, their expenses and questions about how much they actually do (apart from major events, how often is Parliament completely full?), but because of the simple fact that so many ordinary, hard-working people are having to face higher living costs without any wage increases and are being told by these very MPs that they’ll have to just put up with it because of the UK’s economic situation.

Despite millions of people struggling with living costs, MPs also think they have it rough

These opinions aren’t just held by one party however. 47% of Conservative MPs and 39% of Labour MPs felt they were unpaid. Only 9% of Lib Dems held this view, but they thought that the ideal wage for a politician was around £78,000. Dave Prentis, the general secretary of Unison, Britain’s largest public sector trade union, said ‘The idea MPs believe they deserve a 32 per cent increase is living in cloud cuckoo land’.  Matthew Sinclair, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, agreed, saying, ‘Hiking politicians’ wages at a time of pay freezes, benefit caps and necessary spending cuts would be completely unpalatable to taxpayers.

Some MPs have tried to defend their responses, as one wrote in the anonymous comments of the survey that people have ‘no idea’ of ‘the pressure, breadth of knowledge and social skills that are required to do the job’.  If MPs feel they are unpaid, how do they think they rest of the country feels? Didn’t they think about the reaction of the public to their survey responses? Do MPs seriously believe a family struggling to make ends meet, who are have to face turning off their heating to afford to eat, or a graduate who can’t get a job despite having a first-class degree, would think ‘You’re right, £65,000 isn’t anywhere near enough for a politician’?

A lot of MPs seriously seem to have no idea what everyday life is like for a lot of people in Britain, and the results of this survey just show how out of touch they are with the British public by not seeing the irony of telling people to accept pay freezes, lower wages and higher energy bills whilst demanding higher pay for themselves. 

2012 hottest year in American history

Record temperatures are 'a big deal' say NCDC

The United States of America had its hottest year since records began in 2012, with the average temperature being a full degree higher than it was in 1998.

A report released by the National Climatic Data Center shows that the average annual temperature in the country, which this year was hit with heat waves, drought and storms such as Superstorm Sandy, was 55.3F (13C), was 3.2 degrees higher than the 20th century average. The findings of the report should be considered 'a big deal’ according to NCDC scientists, as temperature changes are usually seen as fractions of degrees, but the 2012 is a full degree higher than the previous record of 1998. Nineteen states broke existing temperature records in 2012 and every state had an ‘above normal’ average temperature. The NCDC warned that these figures could lead to a change in what will be considered normal weather conditions in the US in the future.

The majority of states recorded temperatures 'much above normal' in 2012

(Image source - The Guardian)

Climate change campaigners have urged President Obama to fully commit to cutting carbon emissions following the release of the report. "This won't be the last time we break records like this," said Angela Anderson, the director of the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. "The longer we delay reducing emissions, the more climate change we're going to lock in. The president has promised to make climate change a priority in his second term, but he needs to turn those words into action."

Shades of purple have been added to temperature charts to show high temperatures

(Image source - Daily Mail)

The NCDC will also release a report for global temperature next week, with the suggestion being that many countries will have experienced temperature rises during 2012. This week in Australia, as extreme wildfires rage through many areas, experts have had to add extra colours to temperature maps to highlight areas with temperatures above 54C.

Parents turn off heating to feed kids

New figures show how fuel poverty is rising

One in four families are having to turn off their heating to afford to feed their children due to rises in energy bills.

A survey conducted by the Energy Bill Revolution campaign has revealed the startling figure, along with others that highlight just how much fuel poverty in the UK is rising. According to the results, 45% of adults are using blankets and extra layers to keep warm, and nearly half of parents are turning the heating off whilst their children are out. Another shocking figure shows that a fifth of parents claim their children have been getting ill more regularly due to living in a colder house.

The cost of heating is starting to get too much for many families

(Image source - Metro)

The survey was aimed at 1000 members of the Netmums website, with 88% of them stating they more concerned with energy bills now than they were last year. Sally Russell, the founder of Netmums, said 'With almost nine in 10 families now rationing energy use due to spiralling prices, this signals a new winter of discontent for British families.'

Fuel poverty is an issue that has started to affect more and more people and is something Home Reheat has regularly discussed, with recent articles looking at how nearly 300,000 homes will be dragged into fuel poverty this winter and how elderly people will be hit the worst.