Scottish Power sponsor fuel poverty conference

Scottish Power are sponsoring a fuel poverty conference, although making a astonishing £712m profit.

Scottish Power has been selected to sponsor a national fuel poverty conference in Yorkshire. Fuel Poverty Action believe that it is not appropriate for a company that made over £700m last year, to be sponsoring a fuel poverty conference and said the company made millions in profit while people froze in their homes. Though, the organisers of the event say they are happy to work with any company that is willing to support it's efforts and said they are more critical of the government for not providing the funds. 

Figures in 2011, claim that there could be as many as 6m fuel poor households (uSwitch, 2011). 

A company spokesperson defended their sponsorship of the event: "Our support helps National Energy Action to host a very important conference that brings together a range of experts to discuss the issues of fuel poverty and ways to tackle fuel poverty. We have supported the conference previously in 2010, and we are happy to be able to help out again this year."

Climate change petition gains thousands of signatures

Started after climate change debate pushed back in school curriculum

A petition started after the debate on climate change was ‘vastly scaled back’ in the school curriculum has gained over 12,000 signatures.

The petition was started by 15 year old Esha Marwaha after she discovered that the draft key stage 3 (the national curriculum for under 14 year olds) geography curriculum for English schools had pushed back discussion on the issue. In a special blog she wrote for the Guardian, she said ‘Climate change is the most pressing and threatening issue to modern-day society. Through lack of understanding from generations before us, we are having to fix it. And how can we do this without education?’

Campaigners have emailed education secretary Michael Gove to reinstate the climate change debate 

(Image source - Telegraph)

‘Our government, part of the generation who bear much of the responsibility for this problem, intends to not only fail to act on climate change themselves but to obscure the truth from children and young people. It is outrageous that Michael Gove can even consider the elimination of climate change education for under-14s. We must keep climate change in the curriculum in order for young people take on this challenge of tackling the threat posed by our changing climate’. Her views echoed the petition to the education secretary, Michael Gove, on the website change.org.

Following the immense support the petition has gained, which at one point was getting 500 signatures an hour, other groups have joined the campaign to get the climate change debate reinstated to the school curriculum. 2000 people from student network group People and Planet have emailed Gove to argue their case for reinstated the subject. Also, students, members of the UK Youth Climate Coalition and others plan to approach academics, universities and schools to take part in the formal consultation around the plans, which closes on 16 April.

Nuclear plant in Hinkley gets planning consent

Ed Davey gives consent to EDF to build plant in Somerset

A new nuclear power plant will be built in the UK after planning permission was granted by energy secretary Ed Davey.

French firm EDF will be allowed to build two new reactors on the site of an existing power station, which is set to close in 2023, at Hinkley Point in Somerset. The new plant will become one of the biggest in the UK, with estimates suggesting the two 1.6-gigawatt reactors will produce 7% of the country’s energy, enough to power over 5m homes. The new plant at Hinkley will likely be the first in a new wave of power stations as the Coalition looks to replace aging coal and nuclear plants across the country.

The new plant will replace the existing one at Hinkley Point

(Image source - This Is Somerset)

Davey said following the announcement, ‘It's vital to get investment in new infrastructure to get the economy moving. [Hinkley] will generate vast amounts of clean energy and enhance our energy security. It will benefit the local economy, through direct employment, the supply chain and the use of local services’.

However, Davey and EDF are still in negotiations over how much subsidy the energy firm will get during the life of the plant. It is thought officials are discussing a contract that would guarantee the French company being paid nearly £100 for each megawatt hour of electricity produced over 30 to 40 years.

Shale gas good for UK in the short term

Fracking only advised in areas where it will prove most valuable, says report

Shale gas obtained by the process of ‘fracking’ will be beneficially to the UK in reducing carbon emissions, according to the findings of a new report.

The report, from the Grantham Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at LSE, states that by replacing coal-powered power stations with ones run with shale gas, as they will ‘emit less than half the carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour of coal-fired plants’. 

Reports says shale gas can be beneficial, but committed to it too much is 'risky'

(Image source - The Guardian)

However, the report also states that it is risky to assume that the UK has vast quantities of shale gas locked away underground or to assume that gas prices will be lower in years to come. The report believes the best course of action in terms of obtaining shale gas is to focus on areas where it can be most valuable in terms of reducing carbon emissions, which the report describes as a ‘dash for smart gas’.  

‘Fracking’ has proved controversial in Britain, with many critics fearing prolonged fracking sites could lead to earthquakes, polluted water supplies and decreases in housing prices. Supporters of it believe it can provide energy security due to it being collected domestically. Earlier this month, Greenpeace launched a protest outside George Osborne’s constituency office by erecting a mock fracking rig, and last year, the EU warned Britain about ‘jumping headlong’ into shale gas and argued that the country didn’t fully understand the environmental consequences of fracking.

Over 1,800 Green Deal assessments in first month

Contracts worth nearly £27m have been awarded through scheme

Over 1,800 assessments on homes and office buildings have been carried out by Green Deal providers since the scheme was launched at the start of the year.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has released figures showing that, between the end of January and the end of February, 1,803 people had an assessment for a Green Deal package for their property carried out. Edward Davey, the energy and climate change secretary, says the scheme, which lets people take out loans to make energy efficiency improvements to their home, has gotten off to ‘an excellent start’.

Early figures do suggest that the Green Deal scheme is going well

(Image source - Which.co,uk)

‘We're seeing clear signs of a promising new market gathering momentum," he said. "In little more than a month, there have been 1,803 Green Deal assessments and that shows genuine interest from consumers. We have created the Green Deal to overhaul our inefficient housing stock and help people keep their homes warm, while also reducing their energy bills. And as the market builds and awareness of the Green Deal increases, I am confident that consumer interest will grow and grow’.

There were concerns that the Green Deal may fail, as experts claimed the scheme wouldn’t actually save people much money. There were also fears that the scheme hadn’t been widely advertised, as a poll held just days before its official launch found that 81% of people didn’t know what it was. Also, whilst these figures are encouraging, they don’t indicate how many of those who had assessments carried out actually went on to have the work carried out.

Japan extracts 'frozen gas' from seabed

First country to successfully produce methane hydrate gas offshore

Japan has become the first nation to successfully extract ‘frozen gas’ from deposits from under the sea.

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry announced the news with images showing what they claim is gas flaming from a pipe at the project, which is located 50 miles off the coast of central Japan. This breakthrough of harvesting methane hydrate, a form of methane gas which is frozen below the seabed, could be a massive step towards commercial production of the gas for the country, which imports most of its energy due to its own scarce resources.

Commercialising the production of 'frozen gas' could help solve Japan's energy problems

(Image source - The Guardian)

The process of extracting the gas, which uses a technology developed to reduce pressure in the underground layers holding the methane hydrate 4,363 feet below the sea surface, is expensive compared to other forms of gas production. However, this hasn’t put off Ryo Minami, director of the oil and gas division at Japan’s Agency for Natural Resources, who believes they will find of way of lowering the cost of collecting ‘frozen gas’, telling the Financial Times, ‘Ten years ago, everybody knew there was shale gas in the ground, but to extract it was too costly. Yet now it's commercialised’.

Britain at risk from oil supply disruption?

Report suggests station closures and storage capacity cuts could lead to possible crisis

Findings gathered by business advisors Deloitte for the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) argue that, due to reductions in storage capacities to save money, as well as the closure of thousands of petrol stations over the past 40 years means the UK is at risk of oil and petrol shortages if something was to disrupt supplies. It is estimated that the average petrol station has enough stock for just two days demand.

The report is one of two covering the impact the entry of supermarkets and the demise of independent retailers has had on the petrol retailing market. The second, produced by the Office of Fair Trading, rejected arguments from independents that competition in the market was not working because supermarkets controlled the market due to their purchasing power.

The report argues that petrol stations don't have enough stock to cope with disruption to oil supply

(Image source - Daily Mail)

John Hayes, energy minister, said the report showed the retail sector had more than enough stocks to “meet fuel supply shocks” before contingency measures were taken. However, the Petrol Retailers Association, claimed the Deloitte analysis demonstrated that the majority of forecourts were running with “dangerously low” levels of reserves.

In 2011, there were 8,700 petrol stations, down from 37,500 in 1970, with many people believing the rate of closures is due to the power of supermarkets, such as Tesco and Asda, who have petrol stations as part of nearly all of their UK stores. These supermarkets control around 40% of the petrol/diesel market (worth over £47bn a year) despite only accounting for 15% of petrol stations nationwide.

Over a billion people affected by energy poverty

Healthcare and education services left to function without power

A report has found that energy poverty is leaving over a billion people in developing countries without access to adequate healthcare and education services.

The report, Poor People’s Energy Outlook, published by NGO Practical Action, states that nearly half of all healthcare facilities in India, serving around 850 million people, lack electricity. In sub-Sahara Africa, over 30% of facilities lack power, affecting 255 million patients. This has a major impact on the quality of healthcare, as it leaves doctors having to treat patients in the dark and prevents the proper storage of vaccines and ability to sterilise equipment. 

Even facilities that have a power source face severe problems, as in Kenya, only 25% of healthcare centres have a reliable power source. Blackouts can happen at least six times a month, usually leaving facilities without power for four hours at a time.

Candlelight is still the only way to get light in many developing countries

(Image source - Practical Action)

Along with energy storages affecting healthcare, it is estimated that 291 million children go to schools without electricity. In Burundi, only 2% of all schools have access to electricity. The report found that in many schools, windows are kept open, even if it is cold, so the room has a source of natural light. Many schools have limited to no form of ventilation or heating, leaving children to suffer in cold, damp conditions, resulting in negative health effects. In one school in Bolivia, lessons were cut short so the children could help collect firewood to cook their school meals.

The report states that rural areas and areas made up of mainly poor people were the ones most likely to be affected by energy poverty, and that governments of many developing nations are having to put the energy needs of the wealthy in urbanised areas over the needs of others. Practical Action's advocacy lead on energy issues, Helen Morton, said: "The historic neglect of energy in community services undermines the ability to deliver education, healthcare and ultimately development. This report makes the case for the energy services that poor people want, need and have a right to – providing communities with the power to challenge their poverty."

Greenpeace ‘fracking’ protest outside Osborne’s office

Mock equipment set up to highlight impact of gas-drilling practice

The environmental group Greenpeace has launched a protest against the Government’s push for ‘fracking’ outside the Cheshire constituency office of George Osborne.

A team of members has set up a fake drilling rig on a grassy area outside the office following news that fracking companies have issued licenses to start the gas-drilling practice in the area. The group also erected a sign on top of the sign for the local Conservative headquarters which read ‘Frack & Go’, along with signs on the road saying ‘We apologise for any inconvenience while we frack your town’.  

The site of the Greenpeace protest, complete with fences and men in hi-vis vests

(Image source - BBC News)

Greenpeace say they have conducted a poll for residents and found that around 72% are worried fracking will have an impact on their lives, be it through noise, pollution or by affecting housing prices. News that will alarm the Conservative party is that the poll also found that 12% of Tory voters will likely change allegiance if fracking is introduced to the area.

There have already been protests over the possibility of fracking sites elsewhere in the UK, including Blackpool, where an existing site was forced to close following claims the practice had caused two small scale earthquakes in the area. The EU has also criticised Osborne and the Coalition for what they see as a manic ‘dash for gas’.

Heatwaves in US and EU ‘caused by global warming’

Temperature imbalances due to greenhouse gases affecting air systems

Scientists have stated that events such as the 2011 American drought and the 2003 European heatwave were the result of global warming.

The study found that air systems that bring warm air from the tropics and cold air from the Arctic at certain times are slowing down, meaning warm air is staying in areas for longer, causing extreme heatwaves.

Scenes like this are becoming normal during summertime in America because of the impact of global warming

(Image source - National Geographic)

‘During several recent extreme weather events these planetary waves almost freeze in their tracks for weeks’, said Vladimir Petoukhov, lead author of the study at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. ‘So instead of bringing in cool air after having brought warm air in before, the heat just stays’.

Global warming has been blamed for disrupting the air flow because the build-up of greenhouse gases is warming the Arctic at a faster rate than other regions, causing the slow-down of air flow as the temperature difference between the Arctic and southern hemisphere areas is what regulates the air flow system.

Whilst this study only focused on the northern hemisphere in the summer time, the scientists believe that a similar study done during winter would find out that extreme cold weather events, such as the one that has affected the UK recently, were caused by the slowing down of air systems, this time trapping cold air over areas instead of warm air.

Consumer backlash over British Gas profits

Parent company set to announce £2.8bn profit increase

The parent company of British Gas has risked fierce consumer backlash following reports that it is set to announce a 15% increase in profits.

Centrica plans to reveal the figures this week, which show the company has made a profits increase of £2.8bn following the British Gas price hike in October 2011. Centrica have tried to justify their profits by releasing a study that shows the company have had a beneficial impact on the UK economy in terms of jobs and tax payments, but that is unlikely to appease consumers who have been hit with rising prices.

Centrica has argued that its practices are good for the country, but that won't wash with consumers

(Image source - Metro)

Richard Lloyd, executive director at consumer champion, Which?, said, ‘At a time when spiralling energy bills are consumers’ top financial worry, people are bound to question whether they’re paying a fair price for their energy when they see big profits announcements from the energy giants. Centrica’s analysis won’t change that view as record-high bills land on millions of doormats in the coming weeks'.

The news will bring the pricing of energy bills into question again, as well the Government’s plans to reduce them. PM David Cameron announced earlier this year that all energy providers will have to simplify their tariffs and make sure consumers are on the cheapest one possible. However, many critics have argued these measures won’t go far enough and consumers will be confused as to which is the cheapest option.

The future of solar power?

Improved 3D printing can ‘revolutionise’ industry

Following the news that a company has been given £2m funding to develop ‘solar glass’, technology that allows buildings to produce their own low-carbon electricity through their windows, the future of the solar industry looks even brighter thanks to the potential of 3D printing.

Printing 3D solar cells has an advantage over the standard method of PV models because they are less complex to create, weight less and do not need direct overhead sunlight to absorb the UV energy. Studies have also shown that 3D cells can be 20% more efficient than standard flat solar panels, according to researchers at the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

With 3D printing, solar panels like this would just be one way of using solar cells

(Image source - Wired.co.uk)

Another benefit of 3D solar cells is cost. It has been estimated that production of 3D cells would be 50% cheaper than traditional panels because it would eliminate inefficiencies associated with wasting materials. Also, as 3D printing can take place anywhere, shipping costs will be reduced considerably. 

On top of this, 3D printing of solar cell is not limited to one form. Solar cells can be added to things ranging from glass, paper and even fabric, meaning that solar cells creating by 3D printing can be used in more advanced ways compared to traditional methods of creating solar panels.

With the potential of 3D printing starting to gain momentum within technology circles, it seems that solar power, something that has stuttered somewhat in recent years, could finally have a way of becoming a major player in the renewable energy industry.

EU’s emissions trading scheme ‘back on track’

Reforms aim to 'reiterate support' for scheme

The European Union’s system for helping countries reduce their carbon emissions is back on track despite criticism from Conservative MPs and business lobbyists.

The emission trading scheme (ETS) has been reformed to make it more effective and will be debated in the European Parliament sometime in April. However, there has been criticism from Conservative MEPs, two of whom defied David Cameron and voted against the reforms. There has been speculation that the reforms could end up being ‘watered down’ by the time they make it to the parliament vote.

The EST in its current form has failed due to low permit prices

(Image source - ABC)

In their current form, the reforms will hold back some of the EST carbon trading permits until 2019 in an attempt to stop the over-supply of permits and raise the cost of carbon emissions. The original scheme was designed to reduce the carbon emissions of countries by making them buy permits to allow them to release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, with the view that the cost of permits would make countries want to lower their emissions and invest in renewable energy technologies. However, the scheme has been seen as a failure because of the low cost of these permits, along with the fact that many of them were given away for free. 

The reforms would introduce a system of ‘backloading’, which would hold back permits from auction for several years. Rob Elsworth, policy officer at the campaign group Sandbag, said: "The road to structural reform of the ETS starts with backloading. Today's vote puts us firmly on that road. What's more it reiterates support for the EU's flagship climate policy, the ETS. Abandoning it at this point would have left the EU with an even more politically charged debate around alternatives."

Government home energy ‘dithering’ could damage UK housing industry

Plans were supposed to be launched in April but have been delayed until the autumn

Experts have warned that delays to schemes to make new homes in the UK more energy efficient could damage the housing industry in the long run.

A timetable was drawn up to make sure all new homes were ‘zero-carbon’ by 2016, with an ‘uplift’ to current energy efficient was due to be introduced in April. However, those proposals have been delayed until the autumn, leaving workers in the construction industry in the dark over new housing projects. Many companies fear that money used to purchase new equipment and training will be wasted if the government doesn’t confirm its intentions and stick to its home energy efficiency targets.

Housing experts fear Government delays in home energy proposals are damaging the industry

(Image source - Telegraph)

Andrew Warren, director of the Association for the Conservation of Energy said companies and investors were growing increasingly concerned about the silence from government. "Companies have been going to the City to get investment, to enable them to meet the targets, do the training they need and create jobs, and they were doing so based on the timetable set out. If it doesn't happen on time, companies are vulnerable," he said. "This is the real world and I'm getting bored of explaining this to ministers. Business will waste time and money unless government delivers."

This lack of clarity and silence from the Government over the 2016 target, despite still official being dedicated to achieving it, is preventing the construction of new homes, as well as putting off new potential investors in the UK housing industry. A spokesman for the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) said the government's timetable had always been to publish the regulations in spring and introduce them in the autumn, but industry experts said the original timetable had been an April introduction.

Obama left with climate headache following another Keystone protest

White House protest led by celebrity environmental campaigners

The fierce debate over the development of an oil pipeline in America has escalated following the arrest of 50 protesters who had handcuffed themselves to the gates of the White House.

The group, which was made up of environmentalists and celebrities including Kill Bill actress Daryl Hannah, staged their demonstration outside the building to directly call on President Barack Obama to oppose the development of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude oil from tar sands in Canada to refineries in Texas. 

Daryl Hannah has been very vocal about her views regarding climate change

(Image source - New York Times)

Climate campaigners have made their feelings known to Obama for some time, with the President still apparently undecided on the issue. Many politicians believe the pipeline will be beneficial to the country in terms of creating energy and jobs, but campaigners believe the President should be investing more money into renewable energy schemes, sticking to the promises he made to tackle climate change following his re-election.

The protest came the day after Obama made his state of the union speech and, whilst the Keystone XL pipeline wasn’t mentioned during that speech, it has become one of the most contentious issues in America, with climate campaigners seeing it as a defining symbol of Obama’s pledge of deal with climate change. ‘The Keystone pipeline project is the purest test of whether the president is serious about doing something about climate change or not’, Bill McKibben told the few hundred protesters outside the White House. McKibben is the founder of the 350.org group, who have led the protests over the pipeline.

What started as a small protest led by a few students has turned into a mainstream movement within environmental circles. The issue has become a major headache for the President, who it seems will be judged no matter what his final decision over the Keystone XL pipeline will be.

'Solar glass' lets buildings generate own power

New invention adds solar cells to glass panels that can produce low-carbon electricity

An energy company has been given a £2m funding boost after developing a form of glass that can absorb solar energy.

A University  of Oxford spin-off, Oxford Photovoltaics, believe the funding will help them take the remarkable product to the commercial market. The ‘solar glass’ works by adding a very thin layer of transparent, solid-state solar cells to glass, which can then turn up to 12% of solar energy into low-carbon electricity. This means that a new building can use this glass for all of their windows and run a large portion of the building’s electricity needs from it. 

The 'solar glass' can be dyed with numerous colours, giving building designs countless design options

(Image source - The Guardian)

This is why Kevin Arthur, the company’s founder and CEO, believes the product can be a commercial success. ‘What we say here is rather than attach photovoltaics to the building, why not make the building the photovoltaics? If you decide to build a building out of glass, then you've already decided to pay for the glass. If you add this, you're adding a very small extra cost, no more than 10%’.

Glass panels for buildings usually cost about £600 to £1000 per square metre, and adding the solar glass would only cost about £60 to £100 extra. This would only be a small additional cost, as the glass would then generate electricity for the new building. The company is mostly targeting customers creating new buildings throughout 2013, but can also retrofit existing buildings with their technology.

Can Scotland reach their energy targets if they gain independence?

Target of 100% renewable energy may fail without UK help

If Scotland votes to become independent it may result in plans to become totally reliable on renewable energy being scrapped.

This warning comes from academics from four UK universities, who believe that the country won’t be able to fund Alex Salmond’s ambitious plans for 100% of Scotland’s electricity to be generated from renewable energy sources by 2020 if they break away from the UK. Scotland would have to spend billions to fund projects such as offshore wind farms and tidal devices on their own, as they would lose all financial support from the UK government. 

Alex Salmond's plans for a 100% renewable-powered Scotland may have to be put on hold

(Image source - Telegraph)

Academics from universities in Cardiff, Birmingham, Robert Gordan and Queens in Belfast, who worked on the report, titled ‘Delivering Renewable Energy Under Devolution’, believe that this increased cost will result in the target either being postponed to a later date or being scrapped completely. ‘Gaining greater control over energy policy is likely to be an inferior option as far as getting renewables funded is concerned, in comparison with the prospect of achieving a scheme organised by Westminster in which the costs are shared across the UK’, states their report, to be published this week in the journal Political Quarterly. ‘This is because, in practice, funding a significant expansion of Scottish-based off-shore renewables under independence would lead to considerable increases in Scottish electricity prices, something that a Scottish government would find hard to sustain politically’.

For Scotland to meet their energy target requirements, they would have to replace the amount of energy generated from fossil fuels and nuclear power, which is currently 50% of the country’s total energy output. They will also have to deal with the higher costs of developing off-shore wind farms in Scotland, as seas are rougher and deeper, making it harder to build, as well as the fact that off-shore wind farms in England and Wales are cheaper and already more advanced. Also, Scotland will likely lose business from the UK, as the UK will be unlikely to continue to support Scotland’s renewable energy projects with subsidies if they gain independence, as there are cheaper energy alternatives in Ireland.

Sellafield faces prosecution for dumping radioactive waste

Group claim computer error resulted was cause

Nuclear energy company Sellafield has pleaded guilty to charges of dumping radioactive waste in a landfill.

In April 2010, the group disposed of four bags containing contaminated materials including tissues and clothing in the Lillyhall landfill site in Workington, Cumbria, when they should have been sent to the low level waste repository at Drigg. Sellafield Ltd claim this error occurred due to a computer fault, which accidently labelled the bags as general waste. All four bags were retrieved as soon as the error was discovered and disposed of correctly, and no contamination was discovered in the landfill afterwards.

Sellafield Ltd blames the error on a new computer monitor

(Image source - The Guardian)

Ian Parker, nuclear regulation manager for the Environment Agency, said, ‘Our overriding aim in regulating the nuclear industry is to protect people and the environment from the release of radioactive wastes into the environment. We have carried out a thorough investigation in partnership with the Office for Nuclear Regulation and have already required Sellafield Ltd to take action to ensure this does not happen again’.

Sellafield will discover its fate on 8th March, when sentencing will take place at Carlisle Crown Court.

Britain exporting gas cheaper than it is importing it

Ofgem warns of UK energy security being 'undermined'

There are fears that household bills may continue to be inflated because of the fact that Britain is exporting gas that is fetching lower prices abroad and is importing gas from Qatar that is more expensive.

An analysis by the Guardian, conducted jointly with Greenpeace, revealed these figures, which Ofgem, the energy watchdog, believe may be undermining UK energy security because of this distortion in the market. The analysis examined the gas interconnector between the UK and Belgium; a major part of the country’s gas infrastructure, as it has the capacity to carry a fifth of the UK’s gas in winter. However, the report discovered that on over 40% of the days between December 2011 and October 2012, the gas was being exported to the continent despite the wholesale gas price in the UK being higher. Over this period, it is estimated that Britain exported over 15 times more gas than it imported.

Prices may continued to rise if market distortion isn't resolved, warn Ofgem

(Image source - www.offshoreenergytoday.com)

Analysis on monthly government data from Revenue and Customs showed that the UK was importing large amounts of Qatari gas, despite it costing up to 5% more than gas exported to the continent. Ofgem said ‘It is vital that gas on these links flows in line with market signals, to ensure security of supply for customers. However, initial analysis suggests the links are not always being used efficiently. On behalf of consumers, we are looking at all the evidence to establish the facts’. 

This news is the latest in a series of recent reports looking into the ‘dark and murky world’ (as described by Leila Dean of Greenpeace), of the UK’s gas market. In November, there were suggestions that, following the price hikes by the major energy companies, that gas prices were purposely being manipulated.

Nuclear industry in crisis?

Court action follows critical Commons report on plant 

A Commons committee has released a report criticising the management of Sellafield nuclear plant in Cumbria, just days before court action is due to start against the plant for illegal dumping of waste, in a week that could be devastating the reputation of the nuclear industry.

The report claims that Nuclear Management Partners (NMP), the private consortium that manages Sellafield, has failed in its task to reduce the rising costs and delays in dealing with waste and decommissioning facilities. The report points out that, out of the 14 major projects at Sellafield, 12 were behind schedule, five were over-budget and only two were actually running properly, despite the NMP being given £54m to cover fees.

The plant in Cumbria is facing claims of poor management and illegal dumping of waste

(Image source - www.visitcumbria.com)

Margret Hodge MP, chair of the committee, said ‘Taxpayers are not getting a good deal from the arrangement with Nuclear Management Partners. Furthermore, now that Cumbria county council has ruled out West Cumbria as the site of the proposed geological disposal facility, a solution to the problem of long-term storage of the waste is as far away as ever’.

The report, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: Managing Risk at Sellafield, points out that about £1.6bn is being spent annually at the site, where a variety of hazardous materials, including 82 tonnes of plutonium, are kept. The total lifetime cost of dealing with this has continued to rise each year and has now reached £67.5bn.

The management at Sellafield will face further criticism when it appears in court this week facing nine charges relating to claims that four bags containing radioactive material were dumped in a landfill at Lillyhall without permission.

Carbon emissions fall in US

Lowest level since 1994

Carbon dioxide emissions in America fell to their lowest level since 1994 last year.

A report compiled by Bloomberg New Energy Finance for the Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE) shows that emissions fell by 13% over the past five years as a result of investment in new energy-saving technologies and renewable energy.

Despite the widely-held view that Obama is failing in climate change policy, emissions in the US have fallen

(Image source - www.scientificamerican.com)

This fall brings the country more than halfway towards its target of cutting emissions by 17% of 2005 levels over the next decade, despite the fact that many claim that Congress and President Obama have failed to act efficiently on the issue of climate change. Obama can now use these figures to show that America is going in the right direction in terms of dealing with climate change and may improve the country’s standing in global climate negotiations. 

Ethan Zindler, a BCSE analyst said, ‘There have certainly been some solid results on the board in the US as a result of all these changes’. This view is also held by the president of the BCSE, Lisa Jacobsen, who believes the Bloomberg findings prove wrong the Conservative argument that acting on climate change would damage the economy, as GDP continued to rise even as emissions went down.

The report highlighted that the steadily expanding installation of wind, solar, hydro and geothermal energy projects represented the largest single source of new growth last year, reaching $44bn in 2012. The reduction of carbon emissions in America was also helped by 488,000 citizens who opted for a hybrid/plug-in vehicle last year.

Iran threatens to sue BP for oil pollution

Minister claims oil dumped in Caspian Sea

Iran has threatened to sue oil company BP after claims that their Azeri oil platforms are polluting the Caspian Sea.

Iranian media reports that the country’s deputy environment minister, Abdolreza Karbasi, is considering taking BP to court because of oil that has been washed up on Iranian beaches over the past year. ‘Last year, southern coasts of the Caspian Sea were covered with oily patches, and in the last such case, four months ago, 25 tonnes were cleared from Iranian coasts’ said Karbasi, according to Mehr News. It has yet to be revealed what court Iran would attempt to sue BP in. In an email statement, BP claimed they are committed to reporting any oil leaks in Caspian Sea but haven't had to report anything for several years.

BP claims there have been no oil leaks, but Iranian officials say otherwise

(Image source - The Guardian)

This news follows reports on Iran’s Press TV that neighbouring Tehran may sue Azerbaijan, where most of the oil platforms are based. Recently, it has also been announced that Shell Nigeria has been ordered by a Dutch court to pay compensation to a farmer who complained about pollution in the country. The company did however manage to avoid similar charges over complaints made by four other farmers.

'Green Deal' won't work, experts warn

Flagship scheme ‘not guaranteed’ to save consumers money

The government’s ‘Green Deal’ home insulation project that launched today has faced criticism from experts who believe the scheme won’t achieve its goal of getting people out of fuel poverty.

Despite reassurance from government officials that the savings that will come with lower energy usage will outweigh the cost of the ‘green’ loans needed to install the energy-saving features, many experts believe that factors such as the interest rate of the loans (set at just under 7%), along with the cost of initial assessments of the property, set-up fees and operating charges, will put people off investing in the scheme. There are also worries that potential clients will be put off by the fact that the loan repayments are left with the house, meaning that someone moving into a property that has had energy-saving work done to it will have to take over the loan repayments.

The government's energy-saving scheme has been heavily criticised by experts

(Image source - www.bbacerts.co.uk)

Alan Milstein, chairman of the Residential Property Surveyors Association, said ‘For many consumers, taking on a green deal loan may not be the most cost-effective mechanism to fund any green improvements to their property. With early repayment penalties and the uncertainty surrounding how having a green deal loan attached to your property will impact on its future saleability, for many homeowners it may be advisable to look at alternative ways to fund energy efficiency measures’.

This news has put a dampener on the launch of the ‘Green Deal’, although according to a poll published last week, over 80% of people had never heard of the scheme.

What will Obama do about Keystone?

With majority of Senate backing pipeline plans, President faces tough decision

President Barack Obama is facing pressure to go back on his climate change promise as a bipartisan majority in the Senate has called for the controversial Keystone XL pipeline to go ahead.

A letter from 53 senators, a group made up of both Democrats and Republicans, claimed there was no reason to deny approval of the project as it has undergone in-depth environmental review despite protests from campaigners who believe the pipeline, which will pump crude oil from Alberta Tar Sands in Canada to oil refineries in Texas, will lead to higher carbon emissions. 

Whatever Obama decides on the project, the decision will upset a lot of people

(Image source - ABC News)

Keystone leaves Obama in a very difficult position, having pledged to tackle climate change during his second term as President. Denying the project will anger many politicians, who see Keystone as way of providing more energy and creating jobs, but approving it will be seen by environmental campaigners as going back on his word. However, Henry Waxman, a congressman who has set up a taskforce on climate change with senator Sheldon Whitehouse and is against the pipeline, denies that the issue will be ‘make-or-break’ for Obama, saying ‘This is only a small issue compared to the overall objective that the president and we want to achieve," Waxman said. "What would you like me to do? Should I say to the president, 'If you don't agree with me on Keystone, I'm not going to work with you on solving the climate change issue'? That would be a little bit childish and counterproductive’.

Waxman’s views that Keystone is a small issue are held by many others, including the Washington Post, who in an editorial called on the President to ‘ignore the activists who have bizarrely made Keystone XL a line-in-the-sand issue, when there are dozens more of far greater environmental impact’.

'Green Deal? What's that then?'

Over 80% of people haven't heard of new government energy-saving scheme

Just days before a new scheme designed to help people deal with energy costs launches, a poll has discovered that 4 out of 5 people have never heard of it.

The ‘green deal’ works by offering loans to pay for home improvements such as roof insulation, new boilers and draught-proofing, which will help lower the overall cost of energy bills. However, a YouGov poll of 5,071 UK energy customers found that 81% hadn’t heard of the new scheme, with 51% citing that the initial cost of upfront ‘assessment fees’ of between £85 to £150 was a major obstacle for them.

The cost of things like roof insulation is putting people off making their homes energy-efficient

(Image source - solar-renewable-energy.co.uk)

The climate minister, Greg Barker, isn’t worried about the findings, as the scheme is still in its infancy, so people shouldn’t expect a ‘big bang’. He said, ‘We're right at the beginning of the green deal journey, and the report is right to identify there is relatively low consumer understanding around the green deal. It's as you'd expect, as it's yet to be rolled out. I expect that to change over the coming year’.

However, the shadow climate minister, Luciana Berger, has slammed the Coalition’s handling of the scheme, saying ‘It's very worrying that so few people have heard of the green deal just days before it finally goes live’. She added that the interest rates on the loans will leave people paying back more than twice the upfront cost of the measures they have installed, which she thinks will leave many people saying ‘no deal’ to the ‘green deal’.